Initial Realty Co. et al v. Shelly Herman
| Initial Realty Co., Sons Realty Co., P&S Realty Co. and Flatlands Management Co. |
| Shelly Herman |
| 3:2008cv30235 |
| December 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Personal Property: Other Office |
| Hampden |
| Kenneth P. Neiman |
| Michael A Ponsor |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1345 Property Damage |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
Judge Michael A Ponsor: ORDER entered. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in this case on October 18, 2010. No answer or other responsive pleading has since been filed by Defendant, the case still appears to be on appeal. For this reason, counsel for Plaintiffs is hereby ordered to file, on or before December 17, 2010, a written report describing the status of the case. See the attached order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
21
Judge Michael A Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated in this memo and order, the court has denied Minors Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 18). More than a year ago, after extensive negotiations, the painful disputes that gave birth to this litigation were settled. It may be time now for the parties to move on.It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
