International Environmental Management Inc. v. Environtron, Ldt.

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court International Environmental Management Inc. v. Environtron, Ldt.

International Environmental Management Inc. v. Environtron, Ldt.

Plaintiff:	International Environmental Management, Inc.
Defendant:	Envirotron, Ltd.
Case Number:	3:2009cv30025
Filed:	February 12, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Contract: Other Office
County:	Franklin
Presiding Judge:	Kenneth P. Neiman
Presiding Judge:	Michael A Ponsor
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 7, 2010	Filing 57 Judge Michael A Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 55 ). Based upon this, the court hereby DENIES Defendant Fitzgeralds Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 27 ). Defe ndant Ann Taylors Motion to Amend (Dkt. No. 43 ) is hereby ALLOWED. On March 16, 2010, Judge Neiman issued his Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 54 ), setting dates for, among other things, motions for summary judgment. These were to be filed by June 18, 2010, with opposition by July 2, 2010, replies by July 16, 2010, and argument on July 28, 2010. Since no motions have been filed, the court assumes that none will be forthcoming. The July 28 argument date is therefore off. Counsel will appear again before this courton September 14, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. for a final pretrial conference.It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 7, 2010

Filing 57 Judge Michael A Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 55 ). Based upon this, the court hereby DENIES Defendant Fitzgeralds Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 27 ). Defe ndant Ann Taylors Motion to Amend (Dkt. No. 43 ) is hereby ALLOWED. On March 16, 2010, Judge Neiman issued his Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 54 ), setting dates for, among other things, motions for summary judgment. These were to be filed by June 18, 2010, with opposition by July 2, 2010, replies by July 16, 2010, and argument on July 28, 2010. Since no motions have been filed, the court assumes that none will be forthcoming. The July 28 argument date is therefore off. Counsel will appear again before this courton September 14, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. for a final pretrial conference.It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: International Environmental Management Inc. v. Environtron, Ldt.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: International Environmental Management, Inc.
Represented By:	William C. Saturley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Envirotron, Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?