Parent v. Principal Life Insurance Company et al
| Nancy Bigda Parent |
| Principal Life Insurance Company and Checkerboard, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan |
| 3:2010cv30055 |
| March 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Springfield Office |
| Michael A Ponsor |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: PRETRIAL ORDER entered. As follows: Motions for summary judgment will be filed on or before June 3, 2011 and opposed by June 17, 2011. Counsel will appear for argument on June 24, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. See the attached order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
48
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered granting 47 Motion to Dismiss Checkerboard, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan. ALLOWED. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
42
Judge Michael A Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 11 ) and Motion for Discovery(Dkt. No. 31 ) are hereby DENIED. Since argument on these motions, Defendant Checkerboard, Inc. has f iled a motion to dismiss (Dkt. 40 ). The clerk will set this motion down for hearing and, further, set the case for a pretrial conference at the same time. Counsel for all parties will be present at the scheduled time. See the attached memorandum and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
