Baggett et al v. Ashe et al
| April Marlborough and Debra Baggett |
| Patricia Murphy and Michael J. Ashe |
| 3:2011cv30223 |
| September 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Springfield Office |
| Hampden |
| Michael A. Ponsor |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
219
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered, as follows: The court finds that Defendants' policy of permitting male guards to videotape strip searches, even if no viewing occurred, in non-emergency situations, violated the class member s' constitutional rights and that no legitimate, penological interest justified it. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 156) is hereby DENIED, and Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 171) is hereby ALLOWED on the issue of liability. By September 9, 2014, Plaintiff shall submit a proposed schedule to address the questions of potential equitable relief and monetary damages. If Plaintiff's proposal is not assented to, Defendants may submit their counter-proposal by September 23, 2014. It is So Ordered. See the attached memorandum and order for full decision. (Kaplan, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
208
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 206 Motion for a View before or after oral argument on Motion for Summary Judgment. DENIED without prejudice, following oral argument the court may reconsider. So ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
86
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated in the attached memo and order, Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 41 ) is hereby ALLOWED. The pretrial phase of the case will continue to unf old, under the supervision of Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman, in accordance with the revised scheduled order entered on January 9, 2013 (Dkt. No. 36), as modified by the parties joint motion (Dkt. No. 72), adopted by the court on April 30, 2013. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
