Santiago v. Keyes et al
Plaintiff: Jerry Luis Santiago
Defendant: John Doe, Richard Roe, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of State Police and Christopher Keyes
Case Number: 3:2011cv30248
Filed: November 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Springfield Office
County: Barnstable
Presiding Judge: Kenneth P. Neiman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 89 Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered regarding 58 Motion for Summary Judgment, 60 Motion for Summary Judgment, and 62 Motion for Summary Judgment, cc:cl. See Memorandum and Order for details. (Healy, Bethaney)
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered regarding Keyes and Rivera's Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 29 and 49), cc:cl. "...For the reasons stated, Keyes' motion to dismiss is ALLOWED in its entirely, and Rivera& #039;s motion to dismiss is ALLOWED but in part only. As a result, the following counts remain with respect to Keyes: Counts I and II insofar as they state claims against him in his individual capacity. Further, the following count remains against Rivera: Count I insofar as it states a claim against him in his individual capacity under section 1983." See Memorandum and Order for further details. (Healy, Bethaney)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered with regard to Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Remand to State Court and Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss, cc:cl. (Healy, Bethaney)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santiago v. Keyes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Roe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of State Police
Represented By: Kerry David Strayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Keyes
Represented By: Joseph G. Donnellan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Luis Santiago
Represented By: S. Thomas Martinelli
Represented By: Bernard T. O'Connor, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?