Sexual Minorities Uganda v. Lively
| Sexual Minorities Uganda |
| Scott Lively |
| 3:2012cv30051 |
| March 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Springfield Office |
| Hampden |
| Kenneth P. Neiman |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
350
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 248 ) based on lack of jurisdiction is hereby ALLOWED. As noted, the court will decline to exercise sup plemental jurisdiction over the two purely state.law claims. As to. them, the motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED, without prejudice to re-filing in state court if Plaintiff desires. The clerk will enter judgmentof dismissal. This case may now be closed. It is so ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
204
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 149 Motion to Amend Existing Protective Order and Defendant's 173 Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Unredacted Documents. For the re asons stated, Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Unredacted Documents is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Order Regarding Confidentiality of Certain Discovery Material is DENIED. See attached memorandum and order for complete details. (Calderon, Melissa)
|
|
Filing
117
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered. re 104 Objection. OVERRULED. Judge Neiman's ruling addresses a complex and unusual discovery scenario fairly and with sensitivity to the interests of both sides. His disposition is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. So ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
102
Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER with regard to the parties' countervailing submissions regarding a proposed protective order (Dkt. No. 96) entered. As follows: The parties shall revise the Protective Order in accord herewith, execute it and provide it to the court for its endorsement no later than February 28, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
92
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 89 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Adjudication of Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and Request for Expedited Consideration. DENIED. Disagreement with a court's ruling, however sincere, is not a plausible basis for a mandamus petition. Moreover, the harm alleged is no greater than the usual burden on a party to a complex lawsuit. So ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
59
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated in the attached memo and order. Defendants motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 21 and 30 ) are hereby DENIED. The case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman for a pretrial scheduling conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
40
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered. ORDER RE: POSSIBLE VIDEO RECORDING OF HEARING. If either party, or the judge, declines to consent, no recording will occur. Counsel are hereby ordered to notify this court, no later than December 21, 2012, as to whether their client consents to the requested video recording. See the attached order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sexual Minorities Uganda v. Lively | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sexual Minorities Uganda | |
| Represented By: | Baher Azmy |
| Represented By: | Luke S. Ryan |
| Represented By: | Pamela C. Spees |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scott Lively | |
| Represented By: | Horatio G. Mihet |
| Represented By: | Philip D. Moran |
| Represented By: | Mathew D. Staver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
