Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates et al
Plaintiff: H. Richard Austin
Defendant: Stephen W. Houghton and Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
Case Number: 3:2012cv30109
Filed: June 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Springfield Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Ponsor
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered. re 8 Objection to Report and Recommendations. These objections are hereby overruled. The distinction between Fed. R.Civ P.60(d)(3)and Rule 60(d)(1), as well as Plaintiff's disagreement with the First Circuit, are insufficient to avoid dismissal given the history of this litigation. Dismissal stands, as well as the order. So ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)
July 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 1 Complaint filed by H. Richard Austin Action on motion: Upon de novo review, the Report and Recommendation 4 of Magistrate Kenneth P. Neiman fo r sua sponte dismissal of this action is hereby ADOPTED. This Court hereby sua sponte dismisses this case. The Clerk will enter judgment of dismissal. In addiition, it is clear that some order prohibiting further abuse of litigation tactics is nece ssary. For this reason, the court has this day issued a Standing Order in the form suggested by Judge Neiman. Compliance with this Order is required by Pltf. before any further proceedings on this subject matter will be permitted. Violation of the Standing Order may result in substantial monetary penalties; cc/Pltf. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(Finn, Mary)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen W. Houghton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: H. Richard Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?