Natale v. The Espy Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Suzanne M. Natale
Defendant: The Espy Corporation, Mark E. Smith, Thomas W. Potthast, Jr. and Whitney E. Harris
Case Number: 3:2013cv30008
Filed: January 11, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Springfield Office
County: Hampden
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Ponsor
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 95 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. For the foregoing reasons, upon de novo review, the Court hereby ADOPTS Judge Robertson's Report and Recommendation - 88 in its entirety. Pltf's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint 52 is ALLOWED as to Counts I, IV and V, but DENIED as to Counts II, III, VI and VII.Using the CM/ECF procedures, Pltf. should now docket the Amended Complaint in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. (Finn, Mary)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 8 ) is hereby ALLOWED as to Counts III, V, VI, VII and VIII, and DENIED as to Counts I, II, and IV. Defendants Alternat ive Motion to Transfer Venue is also DENIED. The case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman for a pretrial scheduling conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered. approving 25 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER GOVERNING THE PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. (Lindsay, Maurice)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Natale v. The Espy Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzanne M. Natale
Represented By: Andrew G. Levchuk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Espy Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark E. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas W. Potthast, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whitney E. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?