A. v. Colvin

A. v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Charazan Zayas
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	3:2015cv30225
Filed:	December 22, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	Hampden
Presiding Judge:	Katherine A. Robertson
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 19, 2016	Filing 38 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER on Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs Under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Court GRANTS the Pltf's 29 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Under the Equ al Access to Justice Act. For the reasons set forth, and pursuant to the EAJA, the court orders a lump sum payment of fees in the amount of $5,639.17 and expenses in the amount of $19.47, for a total award of $5,658.17 to the plaintif f. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). The plaintiff has agreed to waive direct payment of EAJA funds and agrees that those fees may be paid directly to her attorney (Dkt. No. 30-6, 5). Accordingly, if the plaintiff has no debt registered with the Department of Treasury subject to offset against an EAJA award, the award of fees and expenses should be paid directly to plaintiffs counsel. The case shall remain closed on the courts docket. It is so ordered. (Finn, Mary)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 19, 2016

Filing 38 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER on Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs Under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Court GRANTS the Pltf's 29 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Under the Equ al Access to Justice Act. For the reasons set forth, and pursuant to the EAJA, the court orders a lump sum payment of fees in the amount of $5,639.17 and expenses in the amount of $19.47, for a total award of $5,658.17 to the plaintif f. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). The plaintiff has agreed to waive direct payment of EAJA funds and agrees that those fees may be paid directly to her attorney (Dkt. No. 30-6, 5). Accordingly, if the plaintiff has no debt registered with the Department of Treasury subject to offset against an EAJA award, the award of fees and expenses should be paid directly to plaintiffs counsel. The case shall remain closed on the courts docket. It is so ordered. (Finn, Mary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: A. v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charazan Zayas
Represented By:	Tricia M. Jacobs
Represented By:	Howard D. Olinsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Karen L. Goodwin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?