Brookman v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Brookman
Defendant: Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2016cv11395
Filed: July 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Springfield Office
County: Berkshire
Presiding Judge: Mark G. Mastroianni
Presiding Judge: Katherine A. Robertson
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 54 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying the Defendant's 28 Motion for Protective Order. See Order for complete details. (Finn, Mary)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brookman v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Represented By: Anthony E. Giardino
Represented By: Michael D. Kabat
Represented By: Daniel S. Tarlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Brookman
Represented By: Benjamin K. Steffans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?