F.L. Roberts & Company, Inc. v. North East Freightways, Inc., et al
F.L. Roberts & Company, Inc. |
North East Freightways, Inc., Land-Air Express of New England, LTD and William B. Spencer |
3:2016cv12062 |
October 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Springfield Office |
Hampden |
Katherine A. Robertson |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered Re: Report and Recommendations Regarding 24 Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Land-Air Express of New England, LTD. and 37 Motion to Strike Response to Motion for Default Jud gment. "...Upon de novo review, this court will adopt it, in part. As for the unopposed Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 37), it is hereby ALLOWED. As to the Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. No. 24), it is ALLOWED, in part, solely as to liabili ty, for two reasons. First, as Judge Robertson's Report points out, the issue of damages merits further clarification. Second, Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) prohibits entry of final judgment against fewer than all parties in a lawsuit, absent an e xpress determination by the court that there is "no just reason for delay." The court is not in a position to make such a determination at this point. The case will proceed as to the remaining parties in accordance with the scheduling order as revised. (See Dkt. Nos. 17 & 31.)" See Memorandum for additional details. (Healy, Bethaney) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.