Hayward v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
Plaintiff: Robert J. Hayward
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, West Springfield, City of, Ronald P. Campurciani, Mark Sypek and Danielle Unnamed (?)
Case Number: 3:2016cv30046
Filed: March 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Springfield Office
County: Hampden
Presiding Judge: Katherine A. Robertson
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated and based on the extensive and considered analysis set forth in Judge Robertsons R&R, this court will adopt her recommendation, allow Defendants motions to di smiss all counts, (Dkt. Nos. 7 , 13 ), and deny all Plaintiffs motions, (Dkt. Nos. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 29 ). To the extent Plaintiff has objected to the R&R, his objections are either unrelated to specific findings in the R&R, or m erely inflammatory. the court hereby ADOPTS the 35 R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is hereby GRANTED as to all counts and Plaintiffs various motions DENIED. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayward v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert J. Hayward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Represented By: Heather A Valentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: West Springfield, City of
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Trapani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald P. Campurciani
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Trapani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Sypek
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Trapani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danielle Unnamed (?)
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Trapani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?