Roy et al v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.
| Jordan Roy, Angel Sullivan-Blake and Justin Trumbull |
| FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv30116 |
| August 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Springfield Office |
| Hampden |
| Katherine A. Robertson |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
426
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, "Defendant FedEx Grounds Motion to Maintain Under Seal Documents Attached to Plaintiffs Decertification Opposition Dkt. No. 382 is denied. Plaintiffs are directed to file copies of the documents discussed herein within 21 days of issuance of this order." See attached Memorandum and Order for complete details. (Zamorski, Michael)
|
|
Filing
408
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On Defendants Motion 347 to Decertify the FLSA Conditional Collective. "For the foregoing reasons, FedExs motion to decertify the FLSA conditional collective Dkt. No . 347 is granted. The named Plaintiffs claims will remain pending before this court, but the opt-in Plaintiffs claims will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to schedule a status conference in the matter by no later than April 26, 2024." See attached memorandum and order for complete details.(Zamorski, Michael)
|
|
Filing
386
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL FEDEX'S PRODUCTION OF COMPLIANCE INVESTIGATION REPORTS AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS(Dkt. No. 339 )(Zamorski, Michael)
|
|
Filing
338
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The court denies FedEx's Motion to Redact Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Filed February 22, 2023 (ECF 298) and to Maintain Documents Filed under Seal (Dkt. No. 314 ). Because the parties are in agreement that the names of individual drivers in Exhibits O and P should be redacted, Plaintiffs are directed to submit substitute copies of Exhibits O and P to the Clerk's Office with the names of the individual drivers redacted. These substitute exhibits must be submitted by USPS mail and must be placed in the mail by no later than July 7, 2023.(Zamorski, Michael)
|
|
Filing
328
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered re: Plaintiffs' 298 Motion to Compel FedEx's Production of Documents. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel FedEx's Production of Documents - (Dkt. No. 298) is grante d, in part, as described herein. So much of Plaintiffs' Motion as requests badge swipe data is denied, without prejudice. To the extent FedEx is being directed to produce the same documents that it produced in Claiborne, if the Parties agree, Plaintiffs' Attorneys can use the responsive documents that FedEx produced in Claiborne. FedEx is directed to produce the material within thirty days of this Order unless the Parties agree to a different timeframe. It is so ordered. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
273
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered re: Plaintiffs' 256 Motion to Compel Production of Scanner Data. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Scanner Data - (Dkt. No. 256) is granted. FedEx is ordered to produce the scanner data within 30 days of issuance of this Order.It is so ordered. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
246
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered re: Defendant Fedex Ground Package Systems, Inc.'s 222 Motion for Reconsideration re 221 Court's Discovery Order regarding Obtaining Pay Documents from Opt-In Plaintiffs. For the foregoing reasons, FedExs Motion for Reconsideration is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See Memorandum and Order for complete details. It is so ordered. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
221
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered re: Defendant's 194 Motion to Compel; 195 Motion to Dismiss; 198 Notice and Request for an Order Dismissing with Prejudice those Opt-ins Who Failed to Respond Fully to Discovery by June 4, 2021 ; 204 Motion to Compel. For the above-stated reasons, FedEx's Notice/Request for Order and three Motions Are Granted In Part And Denied In Part as follows:FedEx's Motion to Compel Pay Documents from Current Drivers (Dkt. No. 194) is GRANTED to the limited extent described herein. FedEx's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice Opt-in Plaintiffs who Failed to Comply with the Court's April 22, 2021 Order Compelling Full Document Production (Dkt. No. 19 5) is DENIED. FedEx's Notice and Request for an Order Dismissing with Prejudice those Opt-ins Who Failed to Respond Fully to Discovery by June 4, 2021 (Dkt. No. 198) is GRANTED as to Appleton, Arzeno, Caban, Corcoran, Forcier, Gomez, T. Hayes, H ornedo, Jaro, Louis, Maloney IV, McCormack, McFadries, Miel, Rayneld, Rodrigues, Rose, Schiep, Jose Souza, Stevens, and Valera, and DENIED as to Berch and Harrell. FedEx's Motion to Compel from Plaintiff-Selected Opt-ins (Dkt. No. 204) is GRANTED in limited part and DENIED in part as described herein.It is so ordered. See Order for Complete Details. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
184
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered RE: Plaintiff's 162 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. For reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint - (Dkt. No. 162) is DENIED. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
147
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying RE: 114 Motion Motin to Join Service Providers as Required Parties.. For the above-stated reasons, the Defendant, Fedex's, Rule 19(a) Motion to Join the Service Providers as Required Parties - (Dkt. No. 114) is DENIED. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
118
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: DISCOVERY ORDER entered re 98 MOTION for Hearing filed by FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc. In response to FedEx Ground's Request for Individualized Discovery - (Dkt. No. 98), the Court Orders that the Finalized Written Questionnaire be transmitted to fifty of the Opt-In Plaintiffs who will be selected by FedEx Ground. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
64
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 06 Motion for Issuance of Notice to Similarly Situated Individuals Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b). For the reasons stated her ein, it is ordered that:(1)Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Notice to Similarly Situated Individuals Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) - [Dkt. No. 6] - is GRANTED as to delivery drivers employed by ISPs who deliver FedEx Ground packages in Massachusetts. (2) On or before 12/14/2018, Plaintiffs shall meet and confer with Defendant as to amending the Proposed Notice and Opt-in Consent Form. (3) On or before 12/31/2018, the parties shall file a Motion to Approve Notice, Opt-in Con sent Form, and delivery methods for the Court's consideration. In the event the parties cannot agree on drafts and delivery methods, they shall submit a single Notice and/or Opt-in Consent Form, indicating the language and delivery method(s) to which they agree, the language and delivery method(s) upon which they cannot agree, and the content and delivery method(s) each side proposes. (4) Once the Court approves the Notice and Opt-in Consent Form, Plaintiffs are authorized to issue notice to all members of the conditionally certified collective action in accordance with court-authorized delivery methods. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing
41
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered re: Defendant's 15 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS Defendant FedEx Grounds Motion to Dismiss as to Sullivan-Blakes C laim, but DENIES it as to Roys and Trumbulls Claims. In so ruling, the Court notes that this Memorandum and Order only addresses the Courts personal jurisdiction over FedEx Ground as to the claims of the three named Plaintiffs, to whose claims Defen dants Motion was directed. It does not address whether the same personal jurisdiction analysis would apply as to the claims of Opt-In Plaintiffs. The court declines to issue a ruling that would encompass those claims in the absence of full briefing by the parties on the issue, where District Courts in other jurisdictions are divided on the question as to whether the Court must assess personal jurisdiction as to Opt-In Plaintiffs or whether it is sufficient that FedEx Ground is subject to perso nal jurisdiction in Massachusetts as to the claims brought by named Plaintiffs Roy and Trumbull. See Swamy v. Title Source, Inc., No. C 17-01175 WHA, 2017 WL 5196780, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2017) (holding that all that is needed to satisfy the req uirement of personal jurisdiction in an FLSA collective action is that the Defendant be subject to personal jurisdiction in the forum state as to the Claims brought by the named Plaintiff); but see Maclin, 2018 WL 1468821, at *4 (granting the Defendants Motion to Dismiss the FLSA claims of non-resident Opt-In Plaintiffs for lack of personal jurisdiction). The Clerks Office is directed to set a Status Conference in this matter at the parties earliest convenience. (Finn, Mary)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
