Ruby Realty, LLC v. Ditech Financial LLC
| Ruby Realty, LLC |
| Ditech Financial LLC |
| 3:2018cv12503 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Opposition re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Memorandum of Law Incorporated) (includes Local Rule 7.1 Certificate) filed by Ruby Realty, LLC. (Burstein, David) |
| Filing 10 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 2/1/2019 to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Memorandum of Law Incorporated) (includes Local Rule 7.1 Certificate) by Ruby Realty, LLC.(Burstein, David) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Memorandum of Law Incorporated) (includes Local Rule 7.1 Certificate) by Ditech Financial LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Hackett, Amy) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT Record. (Hackett, Amy) |
| Filing 7 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Ditech Financial LLC answer due 1/7/2019. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to January 7, 2019 to File Answer by Ditech Financial LLC.(Hackett, Amy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Ditech Financial LLC served on 12/6/2018, answer due 12/28/2018. (Burstein, David) |
| Filing 4 Remark: Copy of Notice of Removal sent to Defendant's counsel for service on the State Court in order to obtain the Certified State Court record. (Figueroa, Tamara) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Healy, Bethaney) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to Western Division (Springfield) (Danieli, Chris) |
| Set Deadlines for Ditech Financial LLC. Defendant's response to complaint is due by 12/28/2018. (Counsel notified by email.) (Healy, Bethaney) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ditech Financial LLC ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7440303 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hackett, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruby Realty, LLC v. Ditech Financial LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ditech Financial LLC | |
| Represented By: | Amy B. Hackett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ruby Realty, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David H. Burstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
