LRS Realty, LLC v. Amguard Insurance Company
LRS Realty, LLC |
Amguard Insurance Company |
3:2018cv30130 |
August 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Springfield Office |
Hampden |
Katherine A Robertson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand by Amguard Insurance Company.(O'Connor, David) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. O'Connor on behalf of Amguard Insurance Company (O'Connor, David) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by LRS Realty, LLC. Amguard Insurance Company served on 8/13/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. Acknowledgement filed by LRS Realty, LLC. (Stewart, John) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Amguard Insurance Company. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Lindsay, Maurice) (Lindsay, Maurice). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against LRS Realty, LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7266025 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by LRS Realty, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AmGuard Proposal of Insurance, #2 Exhibit AmGuard Loss Survey Letter, #3 Exhibit AmGuard Disclaimer, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff 93A Letter, #5 Exhibit Plaintiff Supp. 93A Letter, #6 Exhibit Plaintiff Letter RE O&L Limits, #7 Civil Cover Sheet JS44, #8 Supplement Category Sheet)(Stewart, John) (Attachment 4 replaced on 8/8/2018) (Lindsay, Maurice). (Attachment 5 replaced on 8/9/2018) (Lindsay, Maurice). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LRS Realty, LLC v. Amguard Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LRS Realty, LLC | |
Represented By: | John B. Stewart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amguard Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | David M. O'Connor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.