Sparks v. Prudential Insurance Company
Joseph Sparks |
Prudential Insurance Company |
3:2019cv11934 |
September 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Mark G Mastroianni |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Prudential Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hlawek, James) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Prudential Insurance Company.(Hlawek, James) |
Filing 11 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. (cc/pltf) (Bartlett, Timothy) |
Filing 10 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Prudential Insurance Company.(Hlawek, James) |
Filing 9 Copy re 8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer mailed to Joseph Sparks on this day. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
Filing 8 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered finding as moot #4 Motion for Extension of Time. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
Filing 7 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Prudential Insurance Company answer due 10/16/2019. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Prudential Insurance Company.(Hlawek, James) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 4 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Prudential Insurance Company.(Hlawek, James) |
Filing 3 Case transferred to Western Division (Springfield) (McKillop, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Prudential Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial, Inc. for Prudential Insurance Company.. (Hlawek, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Prudential Insurance Company ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7872753 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Local Category Form)(Hlawek, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sparks v. Prudential Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | James M. Hlawek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph Sparks | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.