Rex v. Schindler Elevator Corporationp.
Linda Rex |
Schindler Elevator Corporationp. |
3:2020cv11953 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Mark G Mastroianni |
Katherine A Robertson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Schindler Elevator Corporationp..(Piccirilli, Dawn) |
Filing 8 STATE COURT Record Schindler Elevator Corporationp. summons served on 10/1/2020, answer due 10/22/2020.. (Piccirilli, Dawn) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 6 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Piccirilli, Dawn) |
Filing 5 Remark: A Certified copy of the Notice of Removal has been emailed today to Defendants Counsel for service on the State Court in order to obtain the certified State Court record. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 10/30/2020 Case Number 1:20-cv-11953. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 2 Case transferred to Western Division (Springfield) (McDonagh, Christina) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Schindler Elevator Corporationp. ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8487653 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Category Sheet)(Piccirilli, Dawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rex v. Schindler Elevator Corporationp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporationp. | |
Represented By: | Dawn M. Piccirilli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Linda Rex | |
Represented By: | Kevin G. Murphy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.