Doe v. Williams College
| John Doe |
| Williams College |
| 3:2020cv30024 |
| February 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Katherine A Robertson |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. Case referred for: Full Pretrial, No Dispositive Motions (ptn). (Healy, Bethaney) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Williams College.(Kelly, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Williams College. (Kelly, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth H. Kelly on behalf of Williams College (Kelly, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Daryl J. Lapp on behalf of Williams College (Lapp, Daryl) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Doe. All Defendants. (Russcol, David) |
| Filing 7 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #3 Motion to Proceed Under a Pseudonym. (Figueroa, Tamara) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Williams College. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support re #3 Assented to MOTION to Proceed Under a Pseudonym filed by John Doe. (Russcol, David) |
| Filing 3 Assented to MOTION to Proceed Under a Pseudonym by John Doe.(Russcol, David) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ruth K. O'Meara-Costello on behalf of John Doe (O'Meara-Costello, Ruth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8113413 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Category Form)(Russcol, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. Williams College | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Williams College | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth H. Kelly |
| Represented By: | Daryl J. Lapp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Doe | |
| Represented By: | Ruth K. O'Meara-Costello |
| Represented By: | David A. Russcol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
