Godbolt et al v. Worral et al
| Wilford Godbolt, Jr and Josephine Godbolt |
| James Garnet, Dave Worral and Celeste Mellet Brown |
| 3:2020cv30143 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Katherine A Robertson |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by James Garnet. (Hagopian, Michael) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by James Garnet.(Hagopian, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael R. Hagopian on behalf of James Garnet (Hagopian, Michael) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Fed. Rs. Civ. P. 8, 9(b), 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6)) by Celeste Mellet Brown, Dave Worral. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex. "1" Declaration of Darcie Lyle, #2 Exhibit Ex. "A" Promissory Note Executed by Josephine Godbolt, #3 Exhibit Ex. "B" Mortgage Executed by Josephine Godbolt, #4 Exhibit Ex. "C" Assignment of Mortgage to Ditech, #5 Exhibit Ex. "D" Assignment of Mortgage to LoanCare, LLC, #6 Exhibit Ex. "E" Correspondence from Josephine Godbolt)(Cedroni, Maria) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed James Garnet served on 11/4/2020, answer due 11/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Celeste Mellet Brown served on 11/6/2020, answer due 11/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dave Worral served on 11/2/2020, answer due 11/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $ 400.00, receipt number SPR004424 for #1 Complaint (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Copy re #3 Summons Issued, mailed to Wilford Godbolt, Jr and Josephine Godbolt on 10/14/20. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Celeste Mellet Brown, James Garnet, Dave Worral. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Celeste Mellet Brown, James Garnet, Dave Worral, filed by Wilford Godbolt, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Lindsay, Maurice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
