Ramaella v. Saul
| Jessica Mercy Ramaella |
| Commissioner, SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv30162 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Healy, Bethaney) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jessica Mercy Ramaella.(Ryan, Corrine) Modified on 10/14/2020 to correct event(Lindsay, Maurice). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Jessica Mercy Ramaella. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Ramaella Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Ramaella Category Sheet)(Ryan, Corrine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
