Ocasio v. Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.
| Odemaris Ocasio |
| Six Flags Great Escape, L.P. doing business as Six Flags Great Escape Lodge & Indoor Waterpark |
| 3:2021cv30073 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Electronic notice to counsel: This civil action has been transferred to the Northern District of New York and assigned civil case number 1:21-cv-00997. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 16 Case transferred to to District of Northern New York;. Original file with documents numbered 1-15, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet sent to Clerk in that district. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 15 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #7 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and transferring this case to the Northern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s. 1631. Plaintiff, a Massachusetts resident, was injured while at a water park located in New York. The water park was operated by Defendant, a limited partnership formed under New York law, with a principal place of business in New York, and two limited partners: a New York corporation and an Ohio corporation. Defendant challenged this court's personal jurisdiction, placing on Plaintiff the burden to establish this court's general or specific jurisdiction over Defendant. Cossart v. United Excel Corp., 804 F.3d 13, 18, 20 (1st Cir. 2015). At this early stage, the court applies the prima facie approach, "asking only whether the plaintiff has proffered facts that, if credited, would support all findings 'essential to personal jurisdiction.'" Kuan Chen v. U.S. Sports Acad., Inc., 956 F.3d 45, 51 (1st Cir. 2020). "To make such a showing, the plaintiff cannot rely solely on conclusory averments but must 'adduce evidence of specific facts.'" Id. at 54 (quoting Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Can., 46 F.3d 138, 145 (1st Cir. 1995)). For general jurisdiction, this requires facts sufficient to establish Defendant's "affiliations with the State are so 'continuous and systematic' as to render them essentially at home in the forum State." Goodyear Dunlop Tires Ops., S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). Specific jurisdiction requires a showing that the case relates sufficiently to, or arises from, a significant subset of contacts between the defendant and the forum. Kuan Chen, 956 F.3d at 55 (internal quotations omitted).Plaintiff's factual allegations do not satisfy this standard as to either general or specific jurisdiction. Plaintiff's Complaint is nearly devoid of allegations supporting personal jurisdiction over Defendant. When conclusory allegations are disregarded, all that remains are factual allegations that Defendants advertising reaches Massachusetts and "derives substantial revenue from interstate commerce." (Compl., Dkt. No. 1, para. 8.) The only additional evidence Plaintiff has offered to bolster her position is her own affidavit, in which she states that Defendant's advertising induced her to travel to the water park and that she has been aware of Defendant's advertising, both on the internet and radio, for many years. These facts fall well short of rendering Defendant "essentially at home" in Massachusetts or demonstrating the necessary connection between the alleged tort and Defendants contacts with Massachusetts. See e.g. Marino v. Hyatt Corp., 793 F.2d 427 (1st Cir. 1986) (finding evidence that defendant advertised, solicited business, and operated a hotel in Massachusetts insufficient for general jurisdiction and evidence that Hawaii hotel room was booked in Massachusetts insufficient for specific jurisdiction over claims arising from tort that occurred in Hawaii hotel).Finally, having found Plaintiff has not met her burden of establishing this court's personal jurisdiction over Defendant, the court transfers this action to the Northern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s. 1631, noting also that both Plaintiff and Defendant have proposed such a transfer. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue filed by Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.. (Sonneborn, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #12 Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. Counsel for Defendant should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include Leave to file granted on (date of order) in the caption of the document. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss by Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Reply Brief)(Sonneborn, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue filed by Odemaris Ocasio. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Facchini, Anthony) |
| Filing 10 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Heather M. Eichenbaum. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.. (Sonneborn, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue filed by Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Affidavit Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Affidavit Exhibit C - Affidavit of R.J. Elrick)(Sonneborn, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue by Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Affidavit Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Affidavit Exhibit C - Affidavit of R.J. Elrick)(Sonneborn, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Heather M. Eichenbaum Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8865911 by Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A - Affidavit of Heather M. Eichenbaum)(Sonneborn, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Odemaris Ocasio. Six Flags Great Escape, L.P. served on 6/28/2021, answer due 7/19/2021. Acknowledgement filed by Odemaris Ocasio. (Facchini, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Six Flags Great Escape, L.P.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Six Flags Great Escape, L.P. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8829270 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Odemaris Ocasio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Facchini, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ocasio v. Six Flags Great Escape, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Six Flags Great Escape, L.P. doing business as Six Flags Great Escape Lodge & Indoor Waterpark | |
| Represented By: | Daniel R. Sonneborn |
| Represented By: | Heather M. Eichenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Odemaris Ocasio | |
| Represented By: | Anthony P. Facchini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
