Hall v. Mulqueen et al
| Adam Hall |
| Jane E. Mulqueen, David F. Capeless and Deborah S. Capeless |
| 3:2022cv30045 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter/request (non-motion) from Adam Hall. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 7 Letter/request (non-motion) from Adam Hall. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Letter/request (non-motion) from Adam Hall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice to Berkshire Clerk)(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment by Adam Hall.(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam Hall. (Figueroa, Tamara) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam Hall.(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Adam Hall. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 2, #3 3, #4 4, #5 Letter) (Figueroa, Tamara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
