Skipton v. Welsh et al
Plaintiff: Andrew Skipton
Defendant: Christopher Welsh, Officer Haley and Officer Doe
Case Number: 3:2022cv30049
Filed: April 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Robertson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2022 Filing 15 Copy of #14 Order, Instructions with Blank Form and Docket Sheet mailed to Andrew Skipton on 6/16/2022. (Rivera, Melissa)
June 16, 2022 Filing 14 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. ORDER entered. ORDER re Consent/Declination. In view of the Notice of Case Assignment entered (See Docket No. 2), the Court requests that the parties confer and notify the Court in writing, on or before the close of business on July 8, 2022, whether or not the parties consent to the assignment of this case for all proceedings, including the entry of final judgment, to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. See attached Order for complete details. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent/Declination Form)(Rivera, Melissa)
May 25, 2022 Filing 13 EXHIBIT AUDIO CDs received by clerk's office. The Exhibits are stored on 2 CDs located in the clerk's office filing room. (Zamorski, Michael)
May 25, 2022 Filing 12 Opposition re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM And Alternative Motion For a More Definite Statement filed by Andrew Skipton. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2)(Zamorski, Michael)
May 17, 2022 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM And Alternative Motion For a More Definite Statement filed by Officer Haley, Christopher Welsh. (Lawless, David)
May 17, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM And Alternative Motion For a More Definite Statement by Officer Haley, Christopher Welsh.(Lawless, David)
May 13, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Lawless on behalf of Officer Haley, Christopher Welsh (Lawless, David)
May 2, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Officer Haley served on 4/26/2022, answer due 5/17/2022. (Figueroa, Tamara)
May 2, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Christopher Welsh served on 4/26/2022, answer due 5/17/2022. (Figueroa, Tamara)
May 2, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Officer Doe served on 4/26/2022, answer due 5/17/2022. (Figueroa, Tamara)
May 2, 2022 Filing 5 Letter/request (non-motion) regarding the amount for Complaint from Plaintiff. (Figueroa, Tamara)
April 22, 2022 Filing 4 Filing fee/payment: $ 402, receipt number SPR004778 for #1 Complaint (Zamorski, Michael)
April 22, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Zamorski, Michael)
April 22, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
April 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Andrew Skipton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Zamorski, Michael).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skipton v. Welsh et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Skipton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Welsh
Represented By: David S. Lawless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Haley
Represented By: David S. Lawless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?