Mestek Machinery, Inc. et al v. Elgen Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Mestek Machinery, Inc. and HJ Fischer, LLC
Defendant: Elgen Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv30086
Filed: July 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Robertson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by HJ Fischer, LLC. (Vanderleeden, Kevin)
July 18, 2022 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mestek Machinery, Inc.. (Vanderleeden, Kevin)
July 15, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Elgen Manufacturing Co., Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Danieli, Chris)
July 15, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris)
July 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elgen Manufacturing Co., Inc. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9404295 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Mestek Machinery, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Mestek Inc Disclosure Statement, #2 HJ Fischer Inc Disclosure Statement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B to complaint, #5 Category Form, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Vanderleeden, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mestek Machinery, Inc. et al v. Elgen Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mestek Machinery, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin H. Vanderleeden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HJ Fischer, LLC
Represented By: Kevin H. Vanderleeden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elgen Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?