Achorn v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: April Achorn
Defendant: Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 3:2022cv30134
Filed: October 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Robertson
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting the Parties' Joint #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer , #1 Complaint. Unum Life Insurance Company of America answer due 1/23/2023. (Finn, Mary)
December 15, 2022 Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Unum Life Insurance Company of America.(Hamilton, Joseph)
November 8, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph M. Hamilton on behalf of Unum Life Insurance Company of America (Hamilton, Joseph)
November 2, 2022 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by April Achorn. Unum Life Insurance Company of America waiver sent on 10/24/2022, answer due 12/23/2022. (Macedo, Jonathan)
October 24, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Unum Life Insurance Company of America. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Figueroa, Tamara)
October 24, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
October 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unum Life Insurance Company of America Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9553050 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by April Achorn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 JS45 Category Form)(Macedo, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Achorn v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Achorn
Represented By: Jonathan T. Macedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Represented By: Joseph M. Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?