Grenier et al v. City of Springfield, Massachusetts et al
Plaintiff: Pierre Grenier and Michelle Grenier
Defendant: City of Springfield, Massachusetts and Bernard J. Calvi
Case Number: 3:2023cv30011
Filed: January 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Robertson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2023 Filing 13 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting the Defendants' #12 Motion for Extension of Time to April 21, 2023 to File Answer or Motion to Dismiss re #9 Amended Complaint. Bernard J. Calvi answer/response due 4/21/2023; City of Springfield, Massachusetts answer/response due 4/21/2023. (Finn, Mary)
March 29, 2023 Filing 12 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to April 21, 2023 to File Answer or Motion to Dismiss by Bernard J. Calvi, City of Springfield, Massachusetts.(Rapinchuk, Patricia)
March 23, 2023 Filing 11 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting the Defendants' Assented to #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer/Respond to the #9 Amended Complaint. Bernard J. Calvi Answer/Response due 3/31/2023; City of Springfield, Massachusetts Answer/Response due 3/31/2023. (Finn, Mary)
March 23, 2023 Filing 10 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to March 31, 2023 to File Answer or Motion to Dismiss by Bernard J. Calvi, City of Springfield, Massachusetts.(Rapinchuk, Patricia)
February 27, 2023 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michelle Grenier, Pierre Grenier.(Moriarty, Marshall)
February 14, 2023 Filing 8 STATE COURT Record Bernard J. Calvi summons served on 1/10/2023, answer due 3/24/2023; City of Springfield, Massachusetts summons served on 1/10/2023, answer due 3/24/2023.. (Rapinchuk, Patricia)
February 6, 2023 Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting Defendants' Assented to #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File their Responses/Answer or Motion to Dismiss re: operative complaint. Bernard J. Calvi answer/response due 3/24/2023; City of Springfield, Massachusetts answer.response due 3/24/2023. (Finn, Mary)
February 6, 2023 Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to March 24, 2023 to File Answer or Motion to Dismiss by Bernard J. Calvi, City of Springfield, Massachusetts.(Rapinchuk, Patricia)
January 30, 2023 Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Finn, Mary)
January 30, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
January 30, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Hunter S. Keil on behalf of Bernard J. Calvi, City of Springfield, Massachusetts (Keil, Hunter)
January 30, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia M. Rapinchuk on behalf of Bernard J. Calvi, City of Springfield, Massachusetts (Rapinchuk, Patricia)
January 30, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bernard J. Calvi, City of Springfield, Massachusetts ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9692236 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Category Form)(Rapinchuk, Patricia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grenier et al v. City of Springfield, Massachusetts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pierre Grenier
Represented By: Marshall T. Moriarty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Grenier
Represented By: Marshall T. Moriarty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Springfield, Massachusetts
Represented By: Hunter S. Keil
Represented By: Patricia M. Rapinchuk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bernard J. Calvi
Represented By: Patricia M. Rapinchuk
Represented By: Hunter S. Keil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?