Ostrowski v. Ostrowski
Michael S Ostrowski |
William F Ostrowski |
3:2023cv30018 |
February 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Katherine A Robertson |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Defendant's #10 MOTION to Dismiss ISSUED: A Motion Hearing is set for 4/27/2023 at 11:00 AM in Hampshire Courtroom (IN PERSON) before Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. If unavailable, counsel shall confer regarding availability, come up with three mutually agreed upon dates and so notify the Court for rescheduling. (Rivera, Melissa) |
Filing 17 CONSENT by all parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Michael S Ostrowski.. (Maynard, Kevin) |
Filing 16 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms shall be filed on or before the close of business on April 7, 2023. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at #www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Rivera, Melissa) |
Filing 15 REPLY to Response to #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by William F Ostrowski. (Pikula, Edward) |
Filing 14 Opposition re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Michael S Ostrowski. (Maynard, Kevin) |
Filing 13 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting the Plaintiff's Assented to #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Plaintiff's response due by 3/17/2023. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 12 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to March 17, 2023 to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Michael S Ostrowski.(Maynard, Kevin) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by William F Ostrowski. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Aff of Authenticity of records, #2 Exhibit Ex A - Certified copy Assigment Consent and Acceptance, #3 Exhibit Ex B - Bylaws for Villa by the Ocean, #4 Exhibit Ex C - unit 126 tax bill with values)(Pikula, Edward) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by William F Ostrowski.(Pikula, Edward) |
Filing 9 STATE COURT Record. (Pikula, Edward) |
Filing 8 Set/Reset Deadlines: William F Ostrowski's response/answer to the complaint due 3/1/2023. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting the Defendant's Assented to #6 Motion for Extension of Time to March 1, 2023 the deadline for the defendant to file his response to the complaint. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 1, 2023 to respond to the complaint by William F Ostrowski.(Pikula, Edward) |
Filing 5 Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due deadline for William F Ostrowski set for 2/21/2023 due to the Defendant was served on 1/31/2023. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward M. Pikula on behalf of William F Ostrowski (Pikula, Edward) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by William F Ostrowski ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9724750 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Category Form catagory form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #3 Exhibit Ex. A - State Crt Complaint jury demanded, #4 Exhibit Ex. B - Aff of Service by Atty Maynard, #5 Exhibit Ex. C - Palm Beach County tax and value info)(Pikula, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ostrowski v. Ostrowski | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael S Ostrowski | |
Represented By: | Kevin C. Maynard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: William F Ostrowski | |
Represented By: | Edward M. Pikula |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.