Ly v. Chesky et al.,
| Pro se litigant Mohamed Ly |
| Brian Chesky and Stephen Brighenti |
| 3:2024cv30002 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Trial by Jury by Mohamed Ly.(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 14 Request for notice of default by Mohamed Ly. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 13 Opposition re #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Mohamed Ly. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Brian Chesky. (Yerby, J.) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or, Alternatively, to Dismiss filed by Brian Chesky. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Affidavit of Service, #2 Ex. 2 - Ly Complaint, #3 Ex. 3 - Foster Decision, #4 Ex. 4 - Mason Decision, #5 Ex. 5 - Bendon Decision, #6 Declaration in support of Motion, #7 Ex. A to Declaration, #8 Ex. B to Declaration, #9 Ex. C to Declaration, #10 Ex. D to Declaration, #11 Ex. E to Declaration, #12 Ex. F to Declaration)(Yerby, J.) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Brian Chesky.(Yerby, J.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Patrick Yerby on behalf of Brian Chesky (Yerby, J.) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Brian Chesky served on 2/1/2024, answer due 2/22/2024. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Stephen Brighenti, Brian Chesky. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee/payment: $ 405.00, receipt number 300000365 for #1 Complaint (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ORDER entered. (1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED.(2) If Ly wishes to pursue this action, he must, within twenty-one (21) days, pay the $405 filing fee. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action.(3) The motion for leave to file electronically #3 is GRANTED provided that Ly comply with all procedures and other requirements for filing electronically. Pro se litigants must have an individual PACER account to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at #https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. Pro se e-filing account Instructions #https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-se.htm. If you already have a PACER account with E-Filing access as a pro se litigant, you do not need to register again. Please email tracy_mclaughlin@mad.uscourts.gov. (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Cowan, Nicole) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se by Mohamed Ly. (Figueroa, Tamara) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mohamed Ly. (Figueroa, Tamara) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Mohamed Ly. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit) (Figueroa, Tamara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
