Brooks v. Town of Worthington et al
| Mark J. Brooks |
| Town of Worthington, Charles S. Rose, Amy C. Wang and Stephen T. Smith |
| 3:2024cv30024 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Copy re 13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Order on Motion for leave to electronically file Pro Se mailed to Plaintiff on 3/29/2024. (Lendon, Tyler) |
| Filing 13 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Electronic Order ALLOWING #11 Plaintiff's assented-to Motion for Extension of Time and #12 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Electronically. Plaintiff's response to #9 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is now due on or before 4/26/2024. To gain access to electronic filing, Plaintiff will need to follow the instructions at #https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-se.htm. (Lendon, Tyler) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se by Mark J. Brooks.(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to 4/26/2024 to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Mark J. Brooks.(Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Charles S. Rose, Stephen T. Smith, Town of Worthington, Amy C. Wang. (Lawless, David) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Charles S. Rose, Stephen T. Smith, Town of Worthington, Amy C. Wang.(Lawless, David) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT Record Charles S. Rose summons served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/15/2024; Stephen T. Smith summons served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/15/2024; Town of Worthington summons served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/15/2024; Amy C. Wang summons served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/15/2024.. (Lawless, David) |
| Filing 7 Copy re 6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer mailed to Plaintiff on 2/15/2024. (Lendon, Tyler) |
| Filing 6 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 15, 2024 to File Answer or Response to Plaintiff's Complaint All Defendants. (Lendon, Tyler) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 15, 2024 to File Answer or Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by Charles S. Rose, Stephen T. Smith, Town of Worthington, Amy C. Wang.(Lawless, David) |
| Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Zamorski, Michael) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Lawless on behalf of Charles S. Rose, Stephen T. Smith, Town of Worthington, Amy C. Wang (Lawless, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Charles S. Rose, Stephen T. Smith, Town of Worthington, Amy C. Wang ( Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10261178 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Category Form)(Lawless, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
