Smolka v. United States of America et al
| Thomas E. Smolka |
| Sandra Howard, United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Reginald Barnett, Daniel Goldstein, Charles Denis Howard, David G. Justice and Jorge Luis Partida |
| 4:2008cv40166 |
| August 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Worcester |
| Douglas P. Woodlock |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 49 Motion for summary judgment; finding as moot 31 Motion for Protective Order; finding as moot 35 Motion for Order; finding as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 37 M otion for Order; finding as moot 39 Motion to Expedite; finding as moot 61 Motion for Joinder; granting 66 Motion for Leave to File Document ; granting 68 Motion for Leave to File Document ; granting 69 Motion for Leave to File Document ; g ranting 70 Motion for Leave to File Document ; granting 72 Motion for Leave to File Document ; granting 73 Motion for Leave to File Document ; granting 74 Motion for Leave to File Document ; granting 75 Motion for Leave to File Document ; finding as moot 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
