Abbott GmbH & Co., KG et al v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.
Plaintiff: Abbott GmbH & Co., KG and Abbott Bioresearch Center, Inc.
Defendant: Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2009cv11340
Filed: August 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Worcester Office
County: Barnstable
Presiding Judge: F. Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 540 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendants 517 motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED.(Cicolini, Pietro)
May 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 341 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 181 Motion in Limine; denying 196 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 198 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 199 Motion for Summa ry Judgment; denying 200 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 201 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 202 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 203 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 204 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 205 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 206 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 207 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Castles, Martin)
March 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 333 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 181 Motion in Limine; denying 196 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 198 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 199 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 200 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 201 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 202 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 203 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 204 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 205 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 206 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 207 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Castles, Martin)
May 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 162 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION entered. (Castles, Martin)
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 138 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION.(Castles, Martin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abbott GmbH & Co., KG et al v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abbott GmbH & Co., KG
Represented By: William F. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abbott Bioresearch Center, Inc.
Represented By: William F. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?