Envisn, Inc. v. Davis
Plaintiff: Envisn, Inc.
Defendant: Kathleen Broderick Davis
Thirdparty_defendant: Charles Ryan
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Kathleen Broderick Davis
Counter_claimant: Kathleen Broderick Davis
Counter_defendant: Envisn, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2011cv12246
Filed: December 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Worcester Office
County: Worcester
Presiding Judge: F. Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 106 District Judge Timothy S Hillman: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 81 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Castles, Martin)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 105 District Judge Timothy S Hillman: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER entered denying 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Castles, Martin)
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 District Judge Timothy S Hillman: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion for Discovery. (Castles, Martin)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Castles, Martin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Envisn, Inc. v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Envisn, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas J. Frain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Broderick Davis
Represented By: Scott A. Lathrop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_defendant: Charles Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Kathleen Broderick Davis
Represented By: Scott A. Lathrop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Kathleen Broderick Davis
Represented By: Scott A. Lathrop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Envisn, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas J. Frain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?