Rivera v. Worcester et al
| Paublo Rivera |
| City of Worcester, Richard Burgos, James O'Rourke, Francis Bartley and Gary J. Gemme |
| 4:2012cv40066 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Worcester Office |
| Worcester |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
District Judge Timothy S Hillman: ORDER entered Memorandum and Order granting 86 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Burgos, Sandra)
|
|
Filing
91
Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered denying 62 Motion to Preclude Opinion Testimony of Lieutenant John Towns. (Burgos, Sandra)
|
|
Filing
81
Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 62 Motion to Preclude Opinion Testimony of Detective Daniel Rosario; granting 63 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery( Motions due by 6/6/2014); denying 68 Motion to Re-Open Discovery; denying 68 Motion to Compel Production of Documents; reserving ruling on 62 Motion to Preclude Opinion Testimony of Lieutenant John Towns. Further, the clerk is directed to seal documents 62, 64 & 70 and their corresponding exhibits. (Belpedio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
16
District Judge Timothy S Hillman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying 4 Motion to Dismiss (Castles, Martin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
