Nicholas Fiorillo v. Webster First Federal Credit Union et al
| Nicholas Florillo |
| Webster First Federal Credit Union, Kevin M Curtis, Tina Brenn, Dennis Coy, Felicio Lana, Richard Merlino, Steven Shalansky, Mark Winiker, Curtis Properties, LLC, Canal Marketplace Development LLC, Holliston Masonry Inc., Metrowest Property Management LLC, Blackstone Lofts, LLC, River Street Realty Trust, Tor-Shal Capital LLC and The 426 Main Street Realty, LLC |
| 4:2014cv40080 |
| June 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Worcester Office |
| Worcester |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
District Judge Timothy S Hillman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 107 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 110 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion to Strike ; and denying as moot 126 Motion to Remand. (Castles, Martin)
|
|
Filing
76
District Judge Timothy S Hillman: ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OR DECISION entered finding as moot 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion to Dismiss. (Castles, Martin)
|
|
Filing
31
District Judge Timothy S Hillman: ORDER entered denying 26 Motion to reject notices of dismissal. (Castles, Martin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
