Ortiz v. Roche et al
Jose L Ortiz |
Steve Roche, Michael A. Tarckini, Gary J. Gemme, Matthew Early, Steve Bonczek, Michael V. O'Brien and City of Worcester |
4:2015cv40037 |
February 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Worcester Office |
Worcester |
Timothy S Hillman |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM ORDER entered. For the foregoing reasons, the Defendant's Motion for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Spoliation of Livery Records (Dkt. No. 73) is DENIED. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 99 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED IN PART and otherwise GRANTED consistent with the terms of this Opinion. The Motion is DENIED insomuch as the Defendants' may take deposition t estimony from Mr. Rand about facts that he learned as a result of his investigation in the instant case. They also may take testimony from him about the circumstances surrounding Mr. Coffeys statement, including how it came to be obtained, at whose direction it was obtained, and the manner in which it was obtained, including any written or oral communications between Mr. Rand and Mr. Pineiro with respect to Mr. Coffeys statement. Finally, the Defendants' are entitled to ask Mr. Rand about any oral communications he had with Mr. Pineiro during their October 19, 2016 meeting with Mr. Coffey. In all other respects, the Motion is GRANTED. (Finn, Mary) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.