Negron v. Turco et al
| Jose L. Negron |
| Thomas Turco, Thomas Dickhaut, Abbe Nelligan, Kelly Ryan, Lois Russo, Colette Goguen and Luis Melendez |
| 4:2016cv40150 |
| October 19, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Worcester Office |
| Worcester |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
243
District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER AND MEMORANDUM entered denying 221 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 224 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Castles, Martin)
|
Filing
87
District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(PSSA, 5) (Main Document 87 replaced on 9/7/2017) .
|
Filing
73
District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying 43 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 51 Motion ; denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 61 Motion ; denying 62 Motion ; denyin g 63 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion to Amend; granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion for Joinder; granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion to Substitute Party. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint within 35 days from the date of the entry of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action. Defendants shall respond within 35 days of service of a second amended complaint. (Castles, Martin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.