Thout v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Trustee of The Residential Securitization Trust 2006-G Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated May 1, 2006

Plaintiff: Marc Thout
Defendant: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Trustee of The Residential Securitization Trust 2006-G Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated May 1, 2006
Case Number: 4:2018cv40053
Filed: April 11, 2018
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Office: Worcester Office
County: Worcester
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thout v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Trustee of The Residential Securitization Trust 2006-G Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated May 1, 2006
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marc Thout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Trustee of The Residential Securitization Trust 2006-G Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated May 1, 2006
Represented By: Krystle S. Guillory Tadesse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?