Davis v Berryhill

Plaintiff: David Davis
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2018cv40146
Filed: August 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Timothy S Hillman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2018 Filing 8 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. Procedural Order re Social Security Action. (Jones, Sherry)
August 31, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Summons, Instructions and US Marshal form mailed.) (Jones, Sherry)
August 31, 2018 Filing 6 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue a summons. The plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summons in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1 within 90 days of the date the summons is issued. If so asked by the plaintiff, the United States Marshals Service shall complete service as directed by the plaintiff with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the United States Marshals Service all papers for service. (Castles, Martin)
August 30, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Davis.(Jones, Sherry)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Jones, Sherry)
August 30, 2018 Filing 3 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Jones, Sherry)
August 30, 2018 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Jones, Sherry)
August 30, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by David Davis. (Attachments: #1 civil cover and category sheets)(Jones, Sherry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Christopher Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?