Paris v. City of Worcester et al
Michael J Paris |
City of Worcester, Officers John Doe 1-4, Nathan Reando, Carl Supernor, Michael Ryder, Stephen J Mitchell and Terrence Gaffney |
4:2018cv40169 |
October 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
David H Hennessy |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: Documents #6-10, waiver of service executed, counsel entered the wrong date which calculated the wrong answer due date. The document says it was sent on 11/6/18 not 10/14/18. Clerk will correct the answer due date and reset it to 1/7/19. (Jones, Sherry) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph F. Hennessey on behalf of Michael J Paris (Hennessey, Joseph) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael J Paris. Terrence Gaffney waiver sent on 10/14/2018, answer due 12/13/2018. (Pineiro, Hector) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael J Paris. Carl Supernor waiver sent on 10/14/2018, answer due 12/13/2018. (Pineiro, Hector) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael J Paris. City of Worcester waiver sent on 10/14/2018, answer due 12/13/2018. (Pineiro, Hector) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael J Paris. Nathan Reando waiver sent on 10/14/2018, answer due 12/13/2018. (Pineiro, Hector) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael J Paris. Stephen J Mitchell waiver sent on 10/14/2018, answer due 12/13/2018. (Pineiro, Hector) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew J. Gambaccini on behalf of Terrence Gaffney, Carl Supernor (Gambaccini, Andrew) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against All Defendants, filed by Michael J Paris.(Pineiro, Hector) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City of Worcester, Terrence Gaffney, Stephen J Mitchell, Officers John Doe 1-4, Nathan Reando, Michael Ryder, Carl Supernor. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7364126 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Michael J Paris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 Category Form)(Pineiro, Hector) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/15/2018) (Burgos, Sandra). (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/15/2018) (Burgos, Sandra). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.