Laura et al v. Richardson et al
| Jehrid Laura and Quantreil Laura |
| Sarah Richardson, Honorable Daniel Wrenn, Attorney Peter Ettenberg, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and Honorable Janet Keaton-Walker |
| 4:2018cv40195 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of making service by certified return receipt by Quantreil Laura. (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of 30 day default by Quantreil Laura. (Jones, Sherry) |
Filing 4
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Jones, Sherry)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quantreil Laura.(Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Janet Keaton-Walker, Peter Ettenberg, Sarah Richardson, Daniel Wrenn, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, filed by Jehrid Laura, Quantreil Laura. (Attachments: #1 cover and category sheet)(Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 1 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Jones, Sherry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
