Feeley v. Baker et al
| Daniel Shawn Feeley |
| Governor Charlie Baker, Robert Huge, William Francis Galvin and State of Massachusetts |
| 4:2018cv40211 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall by February 28, 2019, file an amended complaint that complies with the basic pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Castles, Martin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Shawn Feeley.(Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 4 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: PROCEDURAL ORDER re: fee entered. (PSSA, 5) |
Filing 3
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Burgos, Sandra)
|
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Daniel Shawn Feeley. (Attachments: #1 blank forms)(Burgos, Sandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
