Berkley Assurance Co. v. Dahlicious LLC
Berkley Assurance Co. |
Dahlicious LLC |
4:2019cv11452 |
July 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
David H Hennessy |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered approving #7 Stipulation; Dahlicious LLC answer is due 9/5/2019.(Lovett, Jarrett) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION To Grant Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Berkley Assurance Co.. (Grady, Thomas) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dahlicious LLC served on 7/15/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. (Grady, Thomas) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Dahlicious LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Duplicate Filing Fee and Credit for Refund, for $400.00 paid on 07/02/2019, receipt number 0101-7762241. (Tran, Henry) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Alba, Robert) |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 7/2/2019 Case Number 1:19-cv-11452. (Alba, Robert) |
Filing 2 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester) (Currie, Haley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dahlicious LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7762551 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Berkley Assurance Co as subrogee of Harmless Harvest, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Summons)(Grady, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Berkley Assurance Co. v. Dahlicious LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Berkley Assurance Co. | |
Represented By: | Thomas M. Grady |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dahlicious LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.