Berkley Assurance Co. v. Dahlicious LLC
Plaintiff: Berkley Assurance Co.
Defendant: Dahlicious LLC
Case Number: 4:2019cv11452
Filed: July 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: David H Hennessy
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 8 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered approving #7 Stipulation; Dahlicious LLC answer is due 9/5/2019.(Lovett, Jarrett)
August 6, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION To Grant Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Berkley Assurance Co.. (Grady, Thomas)
July 19, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dahlicious LLC served on 7/15/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. (Grady, Thomas)
July 5, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Dahlicious LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra)
July 3, 2019 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Duplicate Filing Fee and Credit for Refund, for $400.00 paid on 07/02/2019, receipt number 0101-7762241. (Tran, Henry)
July 2, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Alba, Robert)
July 2, 2019 Filing 3 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 7/2/2019 Case Number 1:19-cv-11452. (Alba, Robert)
July 2, 2019 Filing 2 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester) (Currie, Haley)
July 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dahlicious LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7762551 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Berkley Assurance Co as subrogee of Harmless Harvest, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Summons)(Grady, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berkley Assurance Co. v. Dahlicious LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Berkley Assurance Co.
Represented By: Thomas M. Grady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dahlicious LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?