UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Prashad et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Savton, LLC, Mohan Prashad, Lanaton, LLC and David Besaw |
| 4:2019cv40114 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Opposition re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #15 First MOTION to Dismiss w/Cert. of Service filed by United States of America. (Leung, Michelle) |
| Filing 17 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Responses due by 11/4/2019. (Castles, Martin) |
| Filing 16 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 11/4/2019 to File Response/Reply to Prashad Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by United States of America.(Leung, Michelle) |
| Filing 15 First MOTION to Dismiss w/Cert. of Service by David Besaw.(O'Brien, Edward) |
| Filing 14 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. David Besaw answer due 10/21/2019. (Castles, Martin) |
| Filing 13 Assented to MOTION to Continue Responsive Pleading Date to 10/21/2019 w/ Certificate of Service by David Besaw.(O'Brien, Edward) Modified on 10/16/2019 (Castles, Martin). |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Lanaton, LLC, Mohan Prashad, Savton, LLC. (Angelini, Michael) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Lanaton, LLC, Mohan Prashad, Savton, LLC.(Angelini, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael P. Angelini on behalf of Lanaton, LLC, Mohan Prashad, Savton, LLC (Angelini, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jared A. Fiore on behalf of Lanaton, LLC, Mohan Prashad, Savton, LLC (Fiore, Jared) |
| Filing 8 US Marshal Process Receipt and Return Executed Mohan Prashad served on 9/23/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 7 US Marshal Process Receipt and Return Executed Lanaton, LLC served on 9/24/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 6 US Marshal Process Receipt and Return Executed Savton, LLC served on 9/24/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 5 US Marshal Process Receipt and Return Executed for David Besaw served on 9/24/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle L. Leung on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Leung, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status: US Government), filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Cummings, Torey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
