Caisse v. Divris
Petitioner: Jesse Caisse
Respondent: Matthew Divris
Case Number: 4:2020cv11432
Filed: August 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Timothy S Hillman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2020 Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to October 28, 2020, to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) by Matthew Divris.(Thornton, Gabriel)
September 11, 2020 Filing 13 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Relief from the Conference Requirement in Local Rule 7.1 and granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to petition.( Response due by 10/1/2020) (Castles, Martin)
August 28, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to October 1, 2020, to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) by Matthew Divris.(Thornton, Gabriel)
August 28, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION Relief from the Conference Requirement in Local Rule 7.1 by Matthew Divris.(Thornton, Gabriel)
August 28, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Gabriel T. Thornton on behalf of Matthew Divris (Thornton, Gabriel)
August 17, 2020 Filing 9 Filing fee/payment: $5.00, receipt number 1BST081449 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Coppola, Katelyn)
August 11, 2020 Filing 8 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order.(Castles, Martin)
August 11, 2020 Filing 7 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying as moot #3 Motion to serve by U.S. Mail. (Castles, Martin)
August 7, 2020 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Alba, Robert)
August 7, 2020 Filing 5 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 8/7/2020 Case Number 1:20-cv-11432. (Alba, Robert)
August 7, 2020 Filing 4 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester). (Currie, Haley)
August 7, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Serve Respondent via U.S. First Class Certified Mail by Jesse Caisse.(Currie, Haley)
August 7, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jesse Caisse.(Currie, Haley)
August 7, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 filed by Jesse Caisse. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Record Appendix)(Currie, Haley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caisse v. Divris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse Caisse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Divris
Represented By: Gabriel T. Thornton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?