Guardado v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 12cr40004
Marlon Guardado |
USA |
4:2020cv40079 |
June 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 USC 2255 and Rehaif by Marlon Guardado.(LaRocque, Jean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Guardado v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 12cr40004 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Marlon Guardado | |
Represented By: | Jean C. LaRocque |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.