Kunz v. Mass Health et al
| Kai Kunz |
| Jeromy Grniet, Liberty Mutual Insurance, Mass Health, MAPFRE Insurance, Jarrod Woeller, Mass Integrity Unit and Mass Health Integrity Unit |
| 4:2021cv40021 |
| February 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 USMS Service Instructions NOTICE (PSSA, 5) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Jeromy Grniet, Liberty Mutual Insurance, MAPFRE Insurance, Jarrod Woeller. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Hohler, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. (PSSA, 5) (Main Document 9 replaced on 3/31/2021) (PSSA, 5). |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Liberty Mutual Insurance, Jeromy Grniet, Mass Health, Jarrod Woeller, MAPFRE Insurance, Mass Health Integrity Unit, filed by Kai Kunz.(Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 7 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Amended Complaint Due April 2, 2021) (PSSA, 5) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kai Kunz.(Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 5 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis "Plaintiff Kai Kunz's (Kunz) motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), this court in its discretion may permit Kunz to proceed without prepayment of the filing and administrative fee if he submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets that Kunz possesses that establishes that he is "unable to pay such fees or give security therefore." Id. Here, Kunzs motion is incomplete. He claims he is unemployed, indicates significant real property assets, no personal property, little cash, but so-called "loss" income, apparently as a result of "depreciation." On this record, the Court cannot assess whether Kunz is eligible for in forma pauperis status. Accordingly, Kunz shall by March 19, 2021 either pay the $402 filing and administrative fees, or file a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis, fully explaining his eligibility for in forma pauperis status. Kunz must also complete and file a Form AO 239 with any such renewed motion. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this form to Kunz. Failure to comply with this Order will likely result in dismissal of this action." (PSSA, 5) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint by Kai Kunz. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kai Kunz.(Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kai Kunz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet and Category Sheet)(Burgos, Sandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
