Kent v. Mapfre U.S.A Corp et al
| Joel Kent |
| Mapfre U.S.A Corp and American Commerce Insurance Company |
| 4:2021cv40074 |
| July 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet by Mapfre U.S.A Corp. (Baldwin, Sharon) |
| Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email.(Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Local Category Form. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents - Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mapfre U.S.A Corp ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8858902 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Statement of Damages, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baldwin, Sharon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
