Blankenship et al v. Dollar General Corporation
Shawn D. Blankenship, Kristina R. Blankenship and David A. Blankenship |
Dollar General Corporation |
4:2022cv40058 |
May 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Allison D Burroughs |
Timothy S Hillman |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE. (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 14 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Granting Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants motion to dismiss, [ECF No. #9 ], is GRANTED and the case will be dismissed. Defendants request to convert the motion to a summary judgment motion is DENIED as moot and its motion for attorneys fees and costs is also DENIED.SO ORDERED.(McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 13 Affidavit in RESPONSE to #9 Defendant's motion to Dismiss filed by Shawn D. Blankenship. (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 12 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On August 22, 2022, Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. [ECF No. #9 ]. Plaintiff's response to this motion was due on September 5, 2022. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing by September 21, 2022, why his complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons articulated in Defendant's motion.(McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (White, David) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION pursuant to LR 7.1 re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by David A. White on behalf of Dollar General Corporation. (White, David) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Dollar General Corporation.(White, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dollar General Corporation served on 7/28/2022, answer due 8/18/2022. (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs added. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni no longer assigned to case. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni added. Case redrawn according to Local Rule 40.1(i). District Judge Timothy S. Hillman no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Dollar General Corporation. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 4 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The claims on behalf of Kristina and David Blankenship are dismissed without prejudice. (Castles, Martin) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shawn D. Blankenship.(Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David A. Blankenship, Kristina R. Blankenship, Shawn D. Blankenship. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Claim, #2 Civil Cover Sheet and Category Sheet)(Burgos, Sandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.