Soto et al v. United States of America et al
| Anthony Steven Soto, I.G.A.O. and Monica Osuna Gomez Llanos |
| United States of America, Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, USCIS Texas Service Center, John Doe(s) 1-10 and Jane Doe(s) 1-10 |
| 4:2022cv40144 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Bless, Jesse) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin E. Brizius on behalf of Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Jane Doe(s) 1-10, John Doe(s) 1-10, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, USCIS Texas Service Center, United States of America (Brizius, Erin) |
| Filing 7 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Ronen Sarraf. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Ronen Sarraf Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9621219 by Monica Osuna Gomez Llanos, I.G.A.O., Anthony Steven Soto. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Ronen Sarraf, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Bless, Jesse) |
Filing 5
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Burgos, Sandra)
|
| Filing 4 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alejandro Mayorkas, Jane Doe(s) 1-10, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, USCIS Texas Service Center, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States of America, John Doe(s) 1-10, Department of Homeland Security Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9620058 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Monica Osuna Gomez Llanos, I.G.A.O., Anthony Steven Soto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Bless, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
