Bader v. Watson et al
| Andrew Bader |
| James Watson and Phylis Nixon Bosomworth |
| 4:2023cv11354 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Margaret R Guzman |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ORDER entered. SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Conference set for 6/26/2024 at 2:15 PM in Courtroom 2 - Worcester (Remote only) before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman. Amended Pleadings due by 3/11/2024, Fact Discovery to be completed by 4/1/2024, Dispositive Motions due by 9/1/2024,(Castles, Martin) |
| Filing 14 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: Scheduling Conference held on 8/11/2023, Case called, Counsel appear by video-conference for scheduling conference, Court adopts parties joint statement as the scheduling order, Order to issue, (Court Reporter: Marianne Kusa Ryll at justicehill@aol.com)(Attorneys present: Mingace/Farrell) (Castles, Martin) |
| Filing 13 First CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Mingace, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Farrell, David) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Farrell, David) |
| Filing 10 First JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference MA. (Mingace, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 8/11/2023 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 2 - Worcester (Remote only) before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman. This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the courtroom deputy of the session as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html.For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the general orders and public notices of the Court available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov. (Castles, Martin) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT Record. (Smith, David) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Phylis Nixon Bosomworth, James Watson.(Smith, David) |
| Filing 6 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Barrows, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Margaret R. Guzman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 6/16/2023 Case Number 1:23-cv-11354. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester). (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Farrell, Jr on behalf of Phylis Nixon Bosomworth, james watson (Farrell, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendants, Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number BMADC-9908321 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Phylis Nixon Bosomworth, james watson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Category Form Category Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, David) Modified docket text on 6/16/2023 (Pacho, Arnold). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
